| What should we do with Jammal Brown |
| Keep |
|
5% |
[ 1 ] |
| Cut |
|
83% |
[ 15 ] |
| Trade |
|
11% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 18 |
|
| Author |
Message |
emoses14
Hog
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1505
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:39 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Hooligan wrote: | See ya, J. Brown.
Definitely DB over RT in the draft. We're going to need to start grooming a stud MLB very soon, too. Polumbus is good enough for now and should only improve. |
Sorry, not trying to nitpick, but you mean another stud MLB? I see Perry Riley developing quite nicely into that mold now, but obviously we need another one to replace the spot Fletcher is vacating. |
|
| Back to top |
|
fetus
piggie
Joined: 25 Mar 2012
Posts: 182
Location: Frisco, Tejas
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
First things first: JM HAS ZERO TRADE VALUE -- so "trade" shouldn't even be an option. There isn't one NFL team stupid or desperate enough to actually give something up or to even pay his current salary. |
Yes I agree see....
| Quote: | | I would wanna say trade him but I don't know what we could get for an unhealthy RT in the off-season, and not to sure who really needs an aging RT. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14709
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fetus wrote: | | Quote: |
First things first: JM HAS ZERO TRADE VALUE -- so "trade" shouldn't even be an option. There isn't one NFL team stupid or desperate enough to actually give something up or to even pay his current salary. |
Yes I agree see....
| Quote: | | I would wanna say trade him but I don't know what we could get for an unhealthy RT in the off-season, and not to sure who really needs an aging RT. |
|
You agreed with me first. 
| Deadskins wrote: | | He has zero trade value. The only real options are cut or keep. I'm guessing he'll be getting an injury settlement soon. This move does free up a roster spot, though. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
fetus
piggie
Joined: 25 Mar 2012
Posts: 182
Location: Frisco, Tejas
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ahh yes I did, my bad LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 3162
Location: 505 New Mexico repn
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| REWORK. Only if he passes physicals and is deemed better then our current back up situation. It couldnt hurt to keep a vet for the youngsters to learn from as well as a good backup who can play different positions on the line. he might just get helathy, and having him compete in camp for a spot isnt a bad thing in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: Re: Jammal Brown to go to IR |
|
|
| riggofan wrote: | | aswas71788 wrote: | | riggofan wrote: | | fetus wrote: |
Brown hasn't really lived up to his $20+ million contract he got last year |
ya think??? 
I read a mock draft the other day that suggested the Redskins go after D.J. Fluker, RT from Alabama with the second pick next year. I don't know if that's the right guy or that we need to use such a high pick, but I like the thinking. Obviously we can't count on Brown. |
Seems to me that we have a more pressing need for a corner back than right tackle. While Polumbus has his faults, he does get the job done, mostly. I could live with him if we can get a quality CB with the 2nd pick. |
Yeah I agree with you on the CB with the 2d pick, exactly why I said I didn't know "that we need to use such a high pick". CB is a big need for us and seems more likely that we could get a day one starter at this position.
I still wouldn't mind seeing the team look at RT in the draft though or o-line depth in general. Gotta keep young Robert on his feet next year!
Laughing that a couple people voted "trade". I'd like to trade Brown too! Might get a ham sandwich for him at this point. |
I see cb as the forth most highest need.
#1 by a mile is Safety!
#2 is another Safety
#3 is RT (a RT that could go to LT if Trent goes down)
#3 is CB (very close to #3)
We have nothing at Safety. I don't want to hear about Brandon "fragile knee" Meriweather or Tannard "take another toke" Jackson. The coaching staff would be irresponsible to go in to another season counting on them to be our safeties.
While I don't especially like Hall or Wilson they are far superior to Gomes, Williams, and Daughty at safety. So to me, safety is our #1 and #2 need.
You could argue CB over RT, especially if Halll is not back, but to me Hall and Wilson are MUCH better CBs than Paulumbus is a RT and combine that with the fact that we have Zero design at LT, that moves RT to #3 for me.
But Free and Strong Safety are clearly #1 AND 2 on or need list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why is trade even an option to vote on. You might as well ask "turn to gold" or "fly to the moon". |
|
| Back to top |
|
fetus
piggie
Joined: 25 Mar 2012
Posts: 182
Location: Frisco, Tejas
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Why is trade even an option to vote on. You might as well ask "turn to gold" or "fly to the moon". |
LOL! I figured I would put it up there, hell more people have chosen that than Keep |
|
| Back to top |
|
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 10626
Location: on the bandwagon
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:42 pm Post subject: Re: Jammal Brown to go to IR |
|
|
| skinsfan#33 wrote: | I see cb as the forth most highest need.
#1 by a mile is Safety!
#2 is another Safety
#3 is RT (a RT that could go to LT if Trent goes down)
#3 is CB (very close to #3) |
I think CB is our third. I know you discount our two penciled-in starters for 2013, but the reality is that at least one of them is likely to play most if not all of next year. The guys we have as backups — who right now are playing as starters — are good enough as backups. That leaves only one safety spot at the top that needs to be covered, in my estimation. (I don't think we'll ever get a full year out of Merriweather in his time here.)
Totally agreed on RT and CB as the next two needs, though, even though I think Hall is likely gone after this year. Polumbus has been great but I just don't see him as the long-term solution. I seem him as being about on par with Stephon Heyer: a good backup, he can play for long stretches of time if needed, but it's unwise to plan on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IB,
You are much more optimistic about the safety possition than I am. I think if we get four games out of Meriweather that would be asking a lot. Jackson has a "life time"ban, but it is rumored that he will be available next year, but that is provided he doesn't take another toke. And i'm not willing to bet the future of the franchise (at least for that year at safety) on a drug addict.
If you are counting on anything out of those two, you have much more faith or are a bigger gambler than I am.
Of course, in the draft you take best available player, in an area of need. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 10626
Location: on the bandwagon
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| skinsfan#33 wrote: | IB,
You are much more optimistic about the safety possition than I am. I think if we get four games out of Meriweather that would be asking a lot. Jackson has a "life time"ban, but it is rumored that he will be available next year, but that is provided he doesn't take another toke. And i'm not willing to bet the future of the franchise (at least for that year at safety) on a drug addict.
If you are counting on anything out of those two, you have much more faith or are a bigger gambler than I am. |
As I point out about, I think it's being realistic. I recall people making the same kinds of predictions about Williams and Davis last year, but we ended up with both for some of the year and will likely have one of them for the entire season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
yupchagee
#14
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 4110
Location: Louisville KY
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject: Re: Jammal Brown to go to IR |
|
|
| riggofan wrote: | | aswas71788 wrote: | | riggofan wrote: | | fetus wrote: |
Brown hasn't really lived up to his $20+ million contract he got last year |
ya think???
I read a mock draft the other day that suggested the Redskins go after D.J. Fluker, RT from Alabama with the second pick next year. I don't know if that's the right guy or that we need to use such a high pick, but I like the thinking. Obviously we can't count on Brown. |
Seems to me that we have a more pressing need for a corner back than right tackle. While Polumbus has his faults, he does get the job done, mostly. I could live with him if we can get a quality CB with the 2nd pick. |
Yeah I agree with you on the CB with the 2d pick, exactly why I said I didn't know "that we need to use such a high pick". CB is a big need for us and seems more likely that we could get a day one starter at this position.
I still wouldn't mind seeing the team look at RT in the draft though or o-line depth in general. Gotta keep young Robert on his feet next year!
Laughing that a couple people voted "trade". I'd like to trade Brown too! Might get a ham sandwich for him at this point. |
I think we need S more than CB. I'd trade Brown for an 8th round pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Irn-Bru wrote: | | skinsfan#33 wrote: | IB,
You are much more optimistic about the safety possition than I am. I think if we get four games out of Meriweather that would be asking a lot. Jackson has a "life time"ban, but it is rumored that he will be available next year, but that is provided he doesn't take another toke. And i'm not willing to bet the future of the franchise (at least for that year at safety) on a drug addict.
If you are counting on anything out of those two, you have much more faith or are a bigger gambler than I am. |
As I point out about, I think it's being realistic. I recall people making the same kinds of predictions about Williams and Davis last year, but we ended up with both for some of the year and will likely have one of them for the entire season. |
This is coherent than Williams and Davis. They had never been suspended for drugs before. If you believe them (and I don't) they used during the lockout and then the subsequent failure came from the MJ not being out of their system before they were tested again and again.
Jackson has been on the program and used again causing him to get suspended. He used again causing him to get suspended again. So he has more of a track record as a user than TW or FD do. TW and FD are not out of the woods yet either. I still give it about a 50/50 chance that one of them will be suspended again in the future. |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Irn-Bru wrote: | | skinsfan#33 wrote: | IB,
You are much more optimistic about the safety possition than I am. I think if we get four games out of Meriweather that would be asking a lot. Jackson has a "life time"ban, but it is rumored that he will be available next year, but that is provided he doesn't take another toke. And i'm not willing to bet the future of the franchise (at least for that year at safety) on a drug addict.
If you are counting on anything out of those two, you have much more faith or are a bigger gambler than I am. |
As I point out about, I think it's being realistic. I recall people making the same kinds of predictions about Williams and Davis last year, but we ended up with both for some of the year and will likely have one of them for the entire season. |
This is coherent than Williams and Davis. They had never been suspended for drugs before. If you believe them (and I don't) they used during the lockout and then the subsequent failure came from the MJ not being out of their system before they were tested again and again.
Jackson has been on the program and used again causing him to get suspended. He used again causing him to get suspended again. So he has more of a track record as a user than TW or FD do. TW and FD are not out of the woods yet either. I still give it about a 50/50 chance that one of them will be suspended again in the future. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14709
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:08 am Post subject: Re: Jammal Brown to go to IR |
|
|
| skinsfan#33 wrote: | | #3 is CB (very close to #3) |
Very close, indeed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 2 of 3 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
