Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Thu May 23, 2013 9:25 am
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Hog Wash - Washington Redskins Football

 » Incompleteness of roster remodeling explains 3-6 record

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  
Author Message
Red_One43
Hog


Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 4606
Location: D.C.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RayNAustin wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:
Ray, I'm not saying I think you will be wrong...hell, you may even be right, but making a change right now during the middle of the season is the wrong thing to do. What I am afraid of is making a change at the end of the year (which I ONLY think would be justified with 2 or less wins in the final 7 games and a clear give up by the team) and repeating the mistakes that we made with Campbell by switching the offensive coordinator on him, and losing a perfect running back in Morris for this offense. So what is your answer to those concerns?


I understand the logic in not making a coaching change mid season .. I really do. And I agree that such a decision is better made at the end.

As for your concerns about switching offenses ... I think you are giving way too much credit to Kyle and Mike, and not recognizing that RG3 and Morris are the ones making that offense go.

Today was a great example .... poor play calling in my opinion .. like these IDIOTIC pitch plays on 3rd and 1. EVERY TIME we lose yardage on that pay when it's a short yardage situation. It drives me crazy. And all of the option plays, and the dink and dunk. RG3 has got one heck of an arm, and it's not being utilized as often as it should be, with all of this option crap. As much as I dislike the old man ... I cannot stand his Son, and I think RG3 would be way better off without Kyle Shanahan and his quirky nonsense.


Even though the convincing win against a division foe was sweet. I was not impressed with the offense as a whole for the reasons Ray pointed out. RGIII makes this thing go. If RGIII called his own plays like he did at the end of the Bucs win, the O would be humming on all cylinders.
Back to top
1niksder
**********
**********


Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16578
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red_One43 wrote:
RayNAustin wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:
Ray, I'm not saying I think you will be wrong...hell, you may even be right, but making a change right now during the middle of the season is the wrong thing to do. What I am afraid of is making a change at the end of the year (which I ONLY think would be justified with 2 or less wins in the final 7 games and a clear give up by the team) and repeating the mistakes that we made with Campbell by switching the offensive coordinator on him, and losing a perfect running back in Morris for this offense. So what is your answer to those concerns?


I understand the logic in not making a coaching change mid season .. I really do. And I agree that such a decision is better made at the end.

As for your concerns about switching offenses ... I think you are giving way too much credit to Kyle and Mike, and not recognizing that RG3 and Morris are the ones making that offense go.

Today was a great example .... poor play calling in my opinion .. like these IDIOTIC pitch plays on 3rd and 1. EVERY TIME we lose yardage on that pay when it's a short yardage situation. It drives me crazy. And all of the option plays, and the dink and dunk. RG3 has got one heck of an arm, and it's not being utilized as often as it should be, with all of this option crap. As much as I dislike the old man ... I cannot stand his Son, and I think RG3 would be way better off without Kyle Shanahan and his quirky nonsense.


Even though the convincing win against a division foe was sweet. I was not impressed with the offense as a whole for the reasons Ray pointed out. RGIII makes this thing go. If RGIII called his own plays like he did at the end of the Bucs win, the O would be humming on all cylinders.


The ran the option without any options Shocked
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11515
Location: New England

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am kind of surprised that so many here want Mike back next year - the poll has a huge # preferring Mike ...

I do not agree with changing coaches and especially HC, DC or OC during the season ...

but

I hope that we have more than a couple of changes at the top of our coaching staff this coming January
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red_One43 wrote:
Even though the convincing win against a division foe was sweet. I was not impressed with the offense as a whole for the reasons Ray pointed out. RGIII makes this thing go. If RGIII called his own plays like he did at the end of the Bucs win, the O would be humming on all cylinders.


So your opinion is that the answer to our team's problems is to not have an offensive coordinator, but allow our rookie QB to just go out and call his own plays?
Back to top
RayNAustin
Hog


Joined: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 2312

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

riggofan wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:
Even though the convincing win against a division foe was sweet. I was not impressed with the offense as a whole for the reasons Ray pointed out. RGIII makes this thing go. If RGIII called his own plays like he did at the end of the Bucs win, the O would be humming on all cylinders.


So your opinion is that the answer to our team's problems is to not have an offensive coordinator, but allow our rookie QB to just go out and call his own plays?


No, I think his point was that Kyle's play calling is pretty questionable, and between the two, our Rookie QB does a better job.
Back to top
Link
233437_For Serious Players
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RayNAustin wrote:
riggofan wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:
Even though the convincing win against a division foe was sweet. I was not impressed with the offense as a whole for the reasons Ray pointed out. RGIII makes this thing go. If RGIII called his own plays like he did at the end of the Bucs win, the O would be humming on all cylinders.


So your opinion is that the answer to our team's problems is to not have an offensive coordinator, but allow our rookie QB to just go out and call his own plays?


No, I think his point was that Kyle's play calling is pretty questionable, and between the two, our Rookie QB does a better job.


Makes sense. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Page 7 of 7All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB