| Author |
Message |
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | We had individual tie-breakers each week. |
I know. I think I won at least one of those.
| Deadskins wrote: | | If we had to, we could go back through each week and add up the tie-breaker point differentials to get a winner. If it was still tied? Who knows? |
If we had to, we could. Was that prodcedure in place last year? Hoss implied no such provision was in place.
Either way we might want to have something in place this year. Maybe ESPN already has something.
ACW - whatcha got?
DarthMonk |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ACW wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | Hey ACW:
Anybody can pick whomever in every game but almost nobody ever picks against the 'Skins. I beleive no one has ever picked against them and gone on to win this thing. |
You know, it's funny. I ALWAYS pick against the 'Skins. That way, if they win great, if they lose, well, at least I get a point. |
Fair warning: You don't want to be a Hognostitraitor.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | ACW wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | Hey ACW:
Anybody can pick whomever in every game but almost nobody ever picks against the 'Skins. I beleive no one has ever picked against them and gone on to win this thing. |
You know, it's funny. I ALWAYS pick against the 'Skins. That way, if they win great, if they lose, well, at least I get a point. |
Fair warning: You don't want to be a Hognostitraitor. |
Nice use of the finger wag!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 10286
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ACW wrote: | | You know, it's funny. I ALWAYS pick against the 'Skins. That way, if they win great, if they lose, well, at least I get a point. |
NIIIIICE. 
Make my day, PUNK
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
ACW
Hog
Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 755
Location: Arlington, VA (Ballston)
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthMonk wrote: | | ACW - whatcha got? |
| Quote: |
Tiebreaker #1 - Higher number of points scored for Week 17
Tiebreaker #2 - Higher number of points scored for Week 16
Tiebreaker #3 - Higher number of points scored for Week 15
Tiebreaker #4 - Higher number of points scored for Week 14
Tiebreaker #5 - Higher number of points scored for Week 13
Tiebreakers will continue backwards from week thirteen (13) until week one (1).
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ACW wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | | ACW - whatcha got? |
| Quote: |
Tiebreaker #1 - Higher number of points scored for Week 17
Tiebreaker #2 - Higher number of points scored for Week 16
Tiebreaker #3 - Higher number of points scored for Week 15
Tiebreaker #4 - Higher number of points scored for Week 14
Tiebreaker #5 - Higher number of points scored for Week 13
Tiebreakers will continue backwards from week thirteen (13) until week one (1).
|
|
There ya have it.
| DarthMonk wrote: | Hey ACW:
-snip-
PS - Last year darn near ended in a tie and no tie-break was in place. Maybe we should discuss that.
DarthMonk |
| Deadskins wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | | no tie-break was in place. |
Not true. |
Not in place then.
In place now. 
DarthMonk |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16591
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wasn't the Monday score the tie breaker in the past. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ACW
Hog
Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 755
Location: Arlington, VA (Ballston)
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | Wasn't the Monday score the tie breaker in the past. |
Well, for weekly I think they use a Monday game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | Wasn't the Monday score the tie breaker in the past. |
Yes - each week. We are talking about a tie for total picks correct at the end of the year ... at least ACW and I are. 
DarthMonk |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place. |
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Oh, and stop top posting her threads!
DarthMonk |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthMonk wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place. |
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Oh, and stop top posting her threads!
|
Documentation? Sure!
And stop post padding to try a get an avatar! |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place. |
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Oh, and stop top posting her threads!
|
Documentation? Sure!
And stop post padding to try a get an avatar! |
You got me on post padding but where's the season-long tie-break rule?
Is it the TB average between 6th and 7th?
Were you running it then?
Did Hoss take over? |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthMonk wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place. |
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Oh, and stop top posting her threads!
|
Documentation? Sure!
And stop post padding to try a get an avatar! |
You got me on post padding but where's the season-long tie-break rule?
Is it the TB average between 6th and 7th?
Were you running it then?
Did Hoss take over? |
Not to mention 4th and 5th ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthMonk wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place. |
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Oh, and stop top posting her threads!
|
Documentation? Sure!
And stop post padding to try a get an avatar! |
You got me on post padding but where's the season-long tie-break rule?
Is it the TB average between 6th and 7th?
Were you running it then?
Did Hoss take over? |
Yes, the TB average was used as a seasonal tie break. No, I never ran the competition. Hoss took over when the program broke down. Many thanks, BTW, Hoss! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 2 of 23 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
