| Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements. |
| Author |
Message |
welch
Skins History Buff
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4665
Location: New York, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:05 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
More names we all know in this AP article:
- Alex Karras
- Tony Dorsett
- Jim McMahon
- Lem Barney
My wife spent five or six agonizing years as a social worker at the memory loss study at Columbia Presbyterian's Neurological Institute. Could not take the despair all through the families of dementia patients, although most were older. Alex Karras is only 76, and Tony Dorsett is in his late 50s. This is bad.
| Quote: | Alex Karras puts face on lawsuit over head injuries in the NFL
By Associated Press, Published: April 14
There’s a new face behind the head injury lawsuits against the NFL, a former All-Pro defensive tackle from the Detroit Lions some may recognize better as the lovable lug of a father from the 1980s sitcom “Webster.”
Before that, Alex Karras played the equally lovable Mongo in “Blazing Saddles,” uttering one of the movie’s best lines when he declared: “Mongo only pawn in game of life.”
He’s 76 now, and suffering from dementia. His wife said this week that a man who used to love to drive his cars can no longer get behind the wheel. She said a man who used to be an amazing cook of Italian and Greek food doesn’t cook anymore because he can’t remember what his recipes were.
He’s among 1,200 former players now suing the NFL, claiming the league misled players about the risks of head injuries and was negligent about their treatment. Many of them are suffering from brain damage, and none of them are getting any better.
For the most part, fans seem to have pretty much discarded them as yesterday’s news. They would rather focus on whether the Cleveland Browns should draft an offensive lineman in the fourth round than whether a former journeyman linebacker or backup safety can tie his shoes or remember what house he lives in.
“It’s the same thing as back in the gladiator days when the gladiators fought to death,” said attorney Craig Mitnick, who represents Karras and hundreds of others in the suit. “Fans care about these guys when they’re playing and they are heroes. But as soon as you’re not a hero and not playing the fan doesn’t really care what happens to them.”
Maybe it’s time we started caring. Debate the merits of the suit all you want — and the NFL will certainly do so — there’s no doubt a lot of former players are paying the price for taking hits to the head during a time when the significance of concussions was either minimized or not entirely known.
Some you may not have ever heard of, or have long forgotten about. Others were once your heroes, taking the field every Sunday for a big paycheck and the chance to bring glory to the franchise.
Jim McMahon was one of those guys. The quarterback who helped bring Chicago a Super Bowl championship was a rebel who clashed with the league, and a fan favorite who prided himself on his toughness and ability to take a hit. Now his girlfriend programs the GPS for their house in case he gets lost, and he gets angry and frustrated at all the things he can’t recall.
“I won’t remember a hell of a lot about this interview in about 10 minutes,” he said in a recent interview on ESPN’s “Outside The Lines.”
Tony Dorsett is a Hall of Famer and one of the greatest running backs in the history of the league. At 57 he’s still relatively young, but the former Dallas Cowboy already forgets people’s names or where he’s heading while driving on the highway. Doctors have told him he’s not getting enough oxygen in the left lobe of his brain, and he fears his memory issues are getting worse.
Yet he and other retirees have no medical insurance from the league, no compensation for their deteriorating health other than the money they earned while they were in the field.
“Yeah, I understand you paid me to do this, but still yet, I put my life on the line for you, I put my health on the line,” Dorsett told The Associated Press just before the Super Bowl. “And yet when the time comes, you turn your back on me? That’s not right. That’s not the American way.”
|
Full article at http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/alex-karras-puts-face-on-lawsuit-over-head-injuries-in-the-nfl/2012/04/14/gIQAjjkxHT_story.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
FanofallthatisGibbs
Hog
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 214
Location: Somewhere in Central Asia
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Still not a fan of them suing, although I completely understand why they are doing it.
What does not sit well with me is that they do not have health insurance coverage from the league. That is one area that the NFL should have conceded a long time ago to minimize bad PR now and in the future. All business aside, it's the right thing to do.
The Players Union should, and perhaps already have renegotiated such a thing, where all players are guaranteed health insurance coverage for themselves and their families as a part of a retirement package upon a minimum level of years played (say, 3-5 minimum).
It might cost the NFL a lot, but it would cost them a lot less than lawsuits, lawyers, etc. It would also benefit the people who served the NFL, not hot shot lawyers looking to make a name for themselves.
I feel for the families. I have known family members to have demensia, and it set in around 60 for my grandmother who lived to the age of 92. That was a long time to go with some serious mental challenges that got progressively worse. I am just not sure how much the NFL is at fault here or liable for the damage done to the players. |
|
| Back to top |
|
emoses14
Hog
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1505
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| FanofallthatisGibbs wrote: | Still not a fan of them suing, although I completely understand why they are doing it.
What does not sit well with me is that they do not have health insurance coverage from the league. That is one area that the NFL should have conceded a long time ago to minimize bad PR now and in the future. All business aside, it's the right thing to do.
The Players Union should, and perhaps already have renegotiated such a thing, where all players are guaranteed health insurance coverage for themselves and their families as a part of a retirement package upon a minimum level of years played (say, 3-5 minimum).
It might cost the NFL a lot, but it would cost them a lot less than lawsuits, lawyers, etc. It would also benefit the people who served the NFL, not hot shot lawyers looking to make a name for themselves.
I feel for the families. I have known family members to have demensia, and it set in around 60 for my grandmother who lived to the age of 92. That was a long time to go with some serious mental challenges that got progressively worse. I am just not sure how much the NFL is at fault here or liable for the damage done to the players. |
It seems to me that their suing, in light of the lack of health coverage for their on the job injuries is their only way of getting access to at least some of the health coverage they can not afford for whatever multitude of reasons. Also, the determination of how much the nfl is at fault is something that can only be answered in one of two ways. A trial where the degree of fault/liability is assessed or through the provision of health care where the same is quantified by agreement. That's it. Since the NFL ain't forkin' over the money to cover, obviously, then suit is the only avenue to recompense.
(I'm positive you know this, but) The fact that a lawyer gets paid for providing their services, regardless of motivation for doing so, does not preclude the complainant, if successful, from recovery. Not sure why an individual performing his job satisfactorily to exceptionally is somehow a negative. |
|
| Back to top |
|
FanofallthatisGibbs
Hog
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 214
Location: Somewhere in Central Asia
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
What you point out is all true.
Re: lawyers - It's mostly a case of one or two bad apples spoiling the bunch. And those are usually found most often in high profile cases, which I would include this class action lawsuit. They leverage publicity, human emotion, and whatever else they can muster to jack up the award, and in doing so pick up an even bigger paycheck. It's their job. I don't always find it ethical.
I am all for justice. Just remember who is paying all the bills at the end of the day - the ticket holders. Personally, I miss the days of affordable professional sports. For that I now have to have a house party, which while fun is just not the same.
EDIT: And congrats on the new addition last July! I have a 1.5 year old daughter myself. Kids are a blessing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
emoses14
Hog
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1505
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FanofallthatisGibbs wrote: | What you point out is all true.
Re: lawyers - It's mostly a case of one or two bad apples spoiling the bunch. And those are usually found most often in high profile cases, which I would include this class action lawsuit. They leverage publicity, human emotion, and whatever else they can muster to jack up the award, and in doing so pick up an even bigger paycheck. It's their job. I don't always find it ethical.
I am all for justice. Just remember who is paying all the bills at the end of the day - the ticket holders. Personally, I miss the days of affordable professional sports. For that I now have to have a house party, which while fun is just not the same.
EDIT: And congrats on the new addition last July! I have a 1.5 year old daughter myself. Kids are a blessing! |
Thank you, and congratulations on your baby girl. They most definitely are a blessing.
And I here you on the "not always finding totally ethical" the different "strategies" that lawyers will employ in their advocacy for their client. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Alex Karras puts face on lawsuit over head injuries in the NFL
By Associated Press, Published: April 14
There’s a new face behind the head injury lawsuits against the NFL, a former All-Pro defensive tackle from the Detroit Lions some may recognize better as the lovable lug of a father from the 1980s sitcom “Webster.”
Before that, Alex Karras played the equally lovable Mongo in “Blazing Saddles,” uttering one of the movie’s best lines when he declared: “Mongo only pawn in game of life.”
He’s 76 now, and suffering from dementia. His wife said this week that a man who used to love to drive his cars can no longer get behind the wheel. She said a man who used to be an amazing cook of Italian and Greek food doesn’t cook anymore because he can’t remember what his recipes were.
He’s among 1,200 former players now suing the NFL, claiming the league misled players about the risks of head injuries and was negligent about their treatment. Many of them are suffering from brain damage, and none of them are getting any better. |
Doesn't sound like Karras really even knows he's suing the NFL. They should definitely have some kind of fund to help out retired veterans. The NFL doesn't need to have stories about veterans falling on hard times, or suffering physically from their playing days. It's disgraceful that they make so much money and won't shell out a little to help the guys who made it all possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
welch
Skins History Buff
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4665
Location: New York, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What hits me hard is that the NFL makes a staggering amount of money, limited by nothing. The owners control the salary cap, so they control the vital cost of doing business. Their business rests on the way guys like Karras and Dorsett and Lem Barney and Rypien play.
At the minimum, the players ought to have health insurance.
Oh, and I blame the owners for ticket prices, and the price of beer and food at the stadium.
An old story about old-time football. George Preston Marshall, "the founder", owned about 70 or 80% of the Redskins. A broadcaster named Harry Wismer owned about 20%. Wismer never got a dividend, because Marshall claimed that the Redskins never made any money. When Marshall had a stroke (more or less), it was discovered that the Redskins made a nice profit every season, which Marshall simply marked as his salary as president of the club, or used to buy a townhouse in each NFL city so Marshall had a place to put his girlfriends.
The guy with power-of-attorney had sold Wismer's 20% to a Canadian department store mogul. The Redskins began to use the profits to buy down Marshall's share of the team. The Canadian guy, who was running a basketball team in LA, owned more of the Redskins each year. That's how Jack Kent Cooke came to be majority owner as Edward Bennett Williams directed the Redskins in the '60s and '70s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
emoses14
Hog
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1505
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| welch wrote: | What hits me hard is that the NFL makes a staggering amount of money, limited by nothing. The owners control the salary cap, so they control the vital cost of doing business. Their business rests on the way guys like Karras and Dorsett and Lem Barney and Rypien play.
At the minimum, the players ought to have health insurance.
Oh, and I blame the owners for ticket prices, and the price of beer and food at the stadium.
An old story about old-time football. George Preston Marshall, "the founder", owned about 70 or 80% of the Redskins. A broadcaster named Harry Wismer owned about 20%. Wismer never got a dividend, because Marshall claimed that the Redskins never made any money. When Marshall had a stroke (more or less), it was discovered that the Redskins made a nice profit every season, which Marshall simply marked as his salary as president of the club, or used to buy a townhouse in each NFL city so Marshall had a place to put his girlfriends.
The guy with power-of-attorney had sold Wismer's 20% to a Canadian department store mogul. The Redskins began to use the profits to buy down Marshall's share of the team. The Canadian guy, who was running a basketball team in LA, owned more of the Redskins each year. That's how Jack Kent Cooke came to be majority owner as Edward Bennett Williams directed the Redskins in the '60s and '70s. |
Wow, thanks for that. Marshall really was piece of . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
