» Skins/Saints Post Game Discussion

cleg · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:50 pm Post subject:

I don't care what the "experts" say, the game was satisfying and we won. Carlos Rogers almost dropped his INT.

welch · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:24 pm Post subject:

aswas71788 · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:12 pm Post subject:

For those of you that said the Redskins were going to win today, you can say "I TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!"

Good game. It is the first game since Jacksonville in which the Redskins looked like a complete team.

Irn-Bru · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:15 pm Post subject:

Big win today, no matter if we can't make the playoffs. Betts slashing into the gut of the secondary for 10+ yard chunks, Campbell airing it out, our receivers making plays (Cooley rumbling down field), Carlos Rogers stepping up big time . . . what's not to like about this win?

Redskin in Canada · ~~~~~~ Joined: 08 Apr 2004 Posts: 10278 Location: Canada

skinzrule · piglet Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Posts: 23

nice win today. Nice to finally enjoy a football game. Cannot take anything good out of this year yet. This team still needs a personell overhaul and a new attitude. It starts with the top #1 danny #2 gibbs. Anyone wonder how good we could have been if the man upstairs stuck it out with Marty?

die cowboys die · Hog Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 2130 Location: Boston, MA

1niksder · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:34 am Post subject:

Odd play, Campbell says he wants to be able to just know where his WR will be. I think we'll see this again but once they haave their timing down LOOK OUT

floridaskinsfan · Hog Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Posts: 311 Location: Orlando, FL

I just love how many times we went deep today. I was good to see things open up. Even though we only scored 16 points, there was the potential there for many more big plays. That was exciting.

I hated seeing Moss getting pissed when Campbell over/underthrew him a few times. He is still much better than Sucknell.

joebagadonuts · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:32 am Post subject:

Campbell needs to work on his short and mid range touch passes. Once he's able to float the ball in between a short and a deep guy, he'll be fine. I would guess that it's a pretty typical fault of young qb's, trying to rifle everything in.

Fios · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:45 am Post subject:

REDEEMEDSKIN · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:58 am Post subject:

Cappster · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:21 am Post subject:

1niksder · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:29 am Post subject:

Everyone is saying his best pass is the deep fade, and we have 3 recievers that are perfect for running that type route. So coners will play off the wideouts and safties will not be able to come down in the box.

Play-action will help the run and the deep routes will help the run game. Not a real option before JC got under center

RayNAustin · Hog Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 2312

I believe Campbell played very average at best, and that's all. All of the dirt balls and overthrown balls to wide open recievers is not good QB play, especially with the running game working so well and the protection he had......he was hardly touched, and had all day to throw. So the jury is still out on him IMO. So far i've seen very little to get overly excited about. He is far from the level of play that we see in Young, and Rivers, and Romo

Betts and the O-Line on he other hand were as good as it gets, and the old D of the past showed up and played great.

But I still just don't get this offensive play calling. The red zone offense is plain pitiful....we're running great....we get in the red zone and get cute and try some mis-direction and lose yards. And kicking FG from iside the 5 yard line is gutless. It almost cost us the game again yesterday. We're lucky Rodgers was having an out-of-body experience.