| Author |
Message |
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3205
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:39 pm Post subject: Brady's Deal |
 |
|
I guess we all know about the deal. All the talk radio says other players should be pissed. I can see why agents for the big QBs (as well as the big QBs themselves) might not be thrilled ...
... but shouldn't the more rank-and-file types like this - especially a few guys the Pats go after who might've wound up on some crappy team for less money?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16578
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:08 pm Post subject: Re: Brady's Deal |
|
|
| DarthMonk wrote: | I guess we all know about the deal. All the talk radio says other players should be pissed. I can see why agents for the big QBs (as well as the big QBs themselves) might not be thrilled ...
... but shouldn't the more rank-and-file types like this - especially a few guys the Pats go after who might've wound up on some crappy team for less money?
|
Brady's old deal would have paid him $30M over the next two years, now that he has signed a three-year, $27 million extension, his base salary will be $1M in 2013, and $2M in 2014. The $27M comes into play in 2015 and beyond but they paid him $30M to sign the deal, so he got a extra $3M over the next two years to help the team lower his cap number.
I'm not sure why this would piss other players off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^ you're right on with that question IMO
some just want to try and stir things up  |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16578
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | ^^ you're right on with that question IMO
some just want to try and stir things up |
He made two years pay (based on when he was on the "top paid" QB list) just to sign a deal that will give him another $3M over the same two years 
Here's another question... if he is earning $3M more than when he was on that list... Why isn't he still on the list?
Or
How many years does Brady have left? I'd say right around TWO |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMO Brady's deal is a good deal for himself and the team - he's not being 'greedy' and it allows the franchise a little more financial room
I'm not a Pats fan - I like to see players get paid well AND allow the team to not be strapped |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3205
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:33 pm Post subject: Re: Brady's Deal |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | DarthMonk wrote: | I guess we all know about the deal. All the talk radio says other players should be pissed. I can see why agents for the big QBs (as well as the big QBs themselves) might not be thrilled ...
... but shouldn't the more rank-and-file types like this - especially a few guys the Pats go after who might've wound up on some crappy team for less money?
|
Brady's old deal would have paid him $30M over the next two years, now that he has signed a three-year, $27 million extension, his base salary will be $1M in 2013, and $2M in 2014. The $27M comes into play in 2015 and beyond but they paid him $30M to sign the deal, so he got a extra $3M over the next two years to help the team lower his cap number.
I'm not sure why this would piss other players off. |
Same here ... and look what Faccid just got:
Joe Flacco and the Baltimore Ravens have agreed to a six-year, $120.6 million contract that makes the quarterback the highest-paid player in NFL history, a source familiar with the deal told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 3163
Location: 505 New Mexico repn
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow.. I'd say ed reed is more important to that team then flaccid.. with the weapons around him and mediocre play, he barely breaks the top ten qbs in my opinion |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
