Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Wed May 22, 2013 2:48 am
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Hog Wash - Washington Redskins Football

 » Rob Jackson: re-sign the man

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2  
Author Message
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14713
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

riggofan wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
riggofan wrote:
And I hate to bring this up, but London Fletcher is a couple million $$s too. What do you do if its a choice between him and Rob Jackson? That could be a tough call.

A call we wouldn't have to make. They play different positions.


You're not serious, are you? Good grief.

I'm talking about the cap space issue. Not keeping Rob Jackson to play Fletcher's position. If it came down to money, and you can only afford to keep one of them, which one would you keep.

You don't understand my issue with that? Since they play different positions, it wouldn't come down to those two. You may as well have said Josh LeRibeus and Fletcher. You would keep both, and get rid of another player further down the depth chart at a position where we have an excess.
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deadskins wrote:
riggofan wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
riggofan wrote:
And I hate to bring this up, but London Fletcher is a couple million $$s too. What do you do if its a choice between him and Rob Jackson? That could be a tough call.

A call we wouldn't have to make. They play different positions.


You're not serious, are you? Good grief.

I'm talking about the cap space issue. Not keeping Rob Jackson to play Fletcher's position. If it came down to money, and you can only afford to keep one of them, which one would you keep.

You don't understand my issue with that? Since they play different positions, it wouldn't come down to those two. You may as well have said Josh LeRibeus and Fletcher. You would keep both, and get rid of another player further down the depth chart at a position where we have an excess.


Its just a hypothetical - I didn't ask how realistic it was. I asked what if you had to make a choice between these two players. If you don't want to consider the possibility however remote, then don't. You're being argumentative about nothing.
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14713
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

riggofan wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
riggofan wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
riggofan wrote:
And I hate to bring this up, but London Fletcher is a couple million $$s too. What do you do if its a choice between him and Rob Jackson? That could be a tough call.

A call we wouldn't have to make. They play different positions.


You're not serious, are you? Good grief.

I'm talking about the cap space issue. Not keeping Rob Jackson to play Fletcher's position. If it came down to money, and you can only afford to keep one of them, which one would you keep.

You don't understand my issue with that? Since they play different positions, it wouldn't come down to those two. You may as well have said Josh LeRibeus and Fletcher. You would keep both, and get rid of another player further down the depth chart at a position where we have an excess.


Its just a hypothetical - I didn't ask how realistic it was. I asked what if you had to make a choice between these two players. If you don't want to consider the possibility however remote, then don't. You're being argumentative about nothing.

Purely hypothetically I would keep Jackson, and try and get London to retire, but your original proposition didn't seem so hypothetical. Seems like you were putting it out there as a distinct possibility. Like I said, you find someone further down the depth chart to cut, or renegotiate contracts so you could keep both.
Back to top
Page 2 of 2All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB