Shanahasn't and never will
- Kilmer72
- Hog
- Posts: 2543
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:05 pm
- Location: Southerner in Yankee land :(
Re: Shanahasn't and never will
by Kilmer72 » Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:50 pm
riggofan wrote:Yeah. I can't believe how many passes Mike Shanahan dropped last night. And I was especially livid when Evan Royster, I mean, Kyle Shanahan, couldn't pick up a yard on 3rd and one.
We need players.
I was wondering why Royster even came off the bench for that. I think Morris gets one yard. Was he dinged up or what?
- DaSkinz Baby
- Hog
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 1:25 pm
- Location: Clarksburg
Re: Shanahasn't and never will
by DaSkinz Baby » Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:15 pm
An undisciplined team with horrendous nepotistic offensive play calling, and poor out of date defensive schemes. A continuing ineffective o-line, and too many old defensive players.
There is one person accountable. Show Mike the door. An unimpressive 24-36 record, and discounting the fluke of 2012, that record is 14-30. Shanny's only positive record as HC was with Elway. Shanny is a mediocre over the hill coach who should be fired before he completely ruins RG3's career. He continues to engage in childish fights with RG3, while attempting to make him an Elway QB, instead of recognizing and playing to RG3's strengths.
There is one person accountable. Show Mike the door. An unimpressive 24-36 record, and discounting the fluke of 2012, that record is 14-30. Shanny's only positive record as HC was with Elway. Shanny is a mediocre over the hill coach who should be fired before he completely ruins RG3's career. He continues to engage in childish fights with RG3, while attempting to make him an Elway QB, instead of recognizing and playing to RG3's strengths.
- Countertrey
- Posts: 16620
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 10:15 pm
- Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
Re: Shanahasn't and never will
by Countertrey » Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:52 pm
"horrendous nepotistic offensive play calling"????? I'm sure that means something somewhere... but, here... I'm pretty sure it's just a creative neologism, intended to present the illusion of a mastery of prose. Sounds pretty... but it don't mean a damned thing.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
- SkinsJock
- Posts: 18028
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: IF you're lucky enough to live in Newport RI, you're lucky enough
Re: Shanahasn't and never will
by SkinsJock » Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:18 pm
sorry trey - it doesn't even sound good, let alone 'pretty' - and I agree it actually means squat 
Nobody really expects the Redskins to do well and this is primarily due to the way the franchise is managed.
It's not the players or the coaches fault. It's time to clean house & change the losing culture here
Re: Shanahasn't and never will
by riggofan » Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:36 am
Countertrey wrote:"horrendous nepotistic offensive play calling"????? I'm sure that means something somewhere... but, here... I'm pretty sure it's just a creative neologism, intended to present the illusion of a mastery of prose. Sounds pretty... but it don't mean a damned thing.
lol. Thank you. That may be the DUMBEST thing I have ever read on here. Nepotistic play calling... That would literally mean Kyle was calling plays favoring some relative of his on the team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
Re: Shanahasn't and never will
by Deadskins » Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:55 pm
riggofan wrote:Countertrey wrote:"horrendous nepotistic offensive play calling"????? I'm sure that means something somewhere... but, here... I'm pretty sure it's just a creative neologism, intended to present the illusion of a mastery of prose. Sounds pretty... but it don't mean a damned thing.
lol. Thank you. That may be the DUMBEST thing I have ever read on here. Nepotistic play calling... That would literally mean Kyle was calling plays favoring some relative of his on the team.
He'd have to be calling plays benefiting Mike. So I guess that means I'm all for "nepotistic offensive play calling."
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)
Hail to the Redskins!